danimim
We are also ENS Official Services Providers (check the proposal), and we have already collaborated with Balancer, integrating it with Aztec to enable them to provide liquidity and facilitate the anonymous tokens swapping and we have an use case that also includes collaborations with NameHash (a platform that integrates ENS onboarding into web3 wallets, apps, and games).
Alex T. Netto - ED, Blockchain and Smart Contract Engineer
7º Top ENS Delegate; Chainlink Advocate and Contributor for the blockchain ecosystem; Winner of more than 7 Hackathons including ETHSão Paulo, SmartCon ETHSamba, and ETHGlobal NY.
Contact: alex@blockful.io
Daniela Zschaber - Product Manager
Chainlink Community Advocate; Postgraduate professor in Web3 MBAs and colleges; Winner of Ethereum Argentina Hackathon (reputation protocol); Speaker at ETH Belgrade, Ethereum Argentina, SmartCon, ETH Denver and the main events in Brazil.
Contact: daniela@blockful.io
Zeugh - Product Owner
A governance nerd, coming from experience design and local politics in Brazil. Working for multiple DAOs and creating others he’s been dedicated to finding ways to improve community governance for the last three years and is part of the Blockful public goods R&D team.
Contact: zeugh@blockful.io
Leonardo Vieira - Software Engineer
Skills in over 10 programming languages, with a focus on Rust and Solidity for smart contract development. Fluxus member and Winner of 2 Hackathons related to the Near Blockchain.
Contact: leonardo@blockful.io
Franco Aguzzi - Front-end Engineer
Worked with worldwide companies and winner of 2 Ethereum Hackathons
Contact: franco@blockful.io
The product consists of a reputation aggregator system that utilizes Stellar badges and on-chain data, prioritizing contribution over plutocracy in DAOs and digital organizations governance, fostering engagement, and encouraging fair collaboration across organizations.
The current approach of relying on token ownership for voting and participation has led to decreased community engagement among members. Additionally, individuals are less motivated to join new communities, fearing the time and effort it would take to establish their reputation from the ground up.
Trustful is a verifiable and interoperable reputation dApp that addresses these challenges by establishing a framework where contributions as a Stellar community member are acknowledged. This system empowers members to influence the community they are dedicated to, not based only on economic power or tokens they possess but on the level of their commitment and efforts towards the community's future (Valocracy).
A pioneering use case in the realm of reputation narrative.
1.1 Absence of a history: make your story count and enhance your on-chain reputation with all past collaborations
1.2 Arbitrariness in role selection decisions: assign roles to those with more knowledge and building experience in specific areas, basing decisions on verifiable reputation – contribution-based role assignment
1.3 Certain Stellar Badges from the quests are tradable, enabling the badge-earning effort to be bought or sold, essentially invalidating any reputation tracking. Since quests are individual and showcase efforts, the solution would be the “soulbinding” of these badges, preventing the splitting of these efforts and encouraging the community to view them as active participation in the ecosystem rather than assets for buying and selling.
2.1 Lack of interoperability between ecosystems: portability matters, so take your Stellar reputation forward, participate in other communities, and show them what you've built on Stellar
2.2 Plutocracy and voting turnout: value valocracy, make your participation and contributions valuable and important; currently, governance tokens lead this front and are still based on monetary power and not always on contribution
2.3 Bribery: when we have a non-transferable reputation based on our verifiable contributions, bribery becomes a harder.
2.4 Absence of an equitable community currency: a community coin can be created taking reputation into account; economic value may be considered, but reputation can be part of the governance equation
2.5 Voting system based only on token holdings amount: reputational systems, combined with delegate and time-stamp systems, can lead to a better equitative model for voting systems in digital organizations, by weighting the voting power by who are fit by reputation in the ecosystem, not only the amount of holdings.
3.1 Lack of engagement: the ease of tracking progress stimulates increased engagement and optimal decision-making based on a unit with high reputation in a specific area
Trustful is divided in two main branches: the badge issuers and the reputation scorers.
The Badge Issuer allows the user to attest the ownership of assets they have and activity they’ve done, giving them a second “non-tradable asset”, which caries the necessary standard information for validating the holder’s reputation. For its initial version, Trustful will operate with a limited set of assets to verify, looking only at assets from: Stellar Quests, Soroban Quests, RPCiege, FCA00C, dApp Quests and Okashi Cakewalk.
The Reputation Scorer allow users to determine a list of “badge:multiplier” pairs, where they can determine what matters for their communities and give it the needed weight. Once a Scorer is created, it becomes openly available for anyone to use for checking one or multiple addresses Reputation Scores against it. For its first version, the Scorers will be limited to checking assets issued on Trustful, with the same scope used for the Badge Issuer.
The budget of $50,000 serves to compensate the team for the development of the Reputation Scorer v1, Badge Issuer v1, and Trustful dApp v1, and also enables the team to begin work on a v2 iteration and conduct market research based on the MVP. This strategic approach ensures that the product evolves into a Minimum Viable Product (MVP) with smooth usability and validated research findings in the realm of reputation and contribution to the GML.